COT3100Logic02

# COT3100Logic02 - ¬ q ⇒ ¬ p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1...

This preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

Rules of Inference 1) p This is the Rule of Detachment or Modus Ponens p q --------- q This can be proved by the truth table below. Very simply, given a premise and an implication using that premise, the conclusion of the implication must follow. p q p q [p (p q)] q 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2) p q This is the Law of Syllogism q r --------- p r Consider the logical form of this law: [(p q) (q r)] (p r) Essentially, this reduces to showing ¬ [(p q) (q r)] (p r) If p is false, we see the statement is true automatically. Thus we must only worry about the case where p is true. In this case, if r is true, we see we are fine as well. Thus, the final case to consider is if p is true and r is false. Regardless of q’s value at least one of (p q) and (q r) must be false in this situation, making the entire assumption true.
3) p q This is Modus Tollens ¬ q --------- ¬ p In logical form we have [(p q) ¬ q] ¬ p Here is a truth table to verify this rule: p q ¬ p ¬ q p q [(p q)

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ¬ q] ⇒ ¬ p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The rest of the rules of implication are listed on page 79 of the book. You will get more practice using these in recitation. Practice Problem : Using the rules of inference, and given the following premises: p ⇒ (q ⇒ r) p ∨ s t ⇒ q ¬ s Show that ¬ r ⇒ ¬ t must be true. Here is a list of the other rules stated in the text, without proof: p q-------p ∧ q (Rule of Conjuction) p ∨ q ¬ p-------q (Rule of Disjunctive Syllogism) ¬ p → F-----------p (Rule of Contradiction) p ∧ q-----------p (Rule of Conjunctive Simplification) p----------p ∨ q (Rule of Disjunctive Amplification) p ∧ q p → (q → r)----------------r (Rule of Conditional Proof) p → r q → r---------(p ∨ q) → r (Rule for Proof by Cases) p → q r → s p ∨ r---------q ∨ s (Rule of the Constructive Dilemma) p → q r → s ¬ q ∨ ¬ s-----------¬ p ∨ ¬ r...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern