intsu11midtermsecondtrys - Introductory Number Theory....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Introductory Number Theory. Midterm Exam-Take twoSolutions Note: Every question either appeared on the study guide or is a particular case of a question appearing there. In your proofs, there should be no non sequiturs 1 , irrelevancies, etc. Speculative statements, numerical examples play a role in a classroom presentation, are essential when trying to figure something out, but have no place in a proof you write in an exam or homework for a grade. Finally, if I find anything hard to read, I will assume it is wrong. In other words, write clearly. 1. Prove: There exists an infinity of prime numbers. 2. Prove that the product of any three consecutive numbers is divisible by 6. Solution. This is a fairly obvious result, not much to prove. One can use that because gcd (2 , 3) = 1, a number is divisible by 6 if (and only if) it is divisible by 2 and by 3 (a reason nobody gave 2 ) and of any two consecutive numbers one has to be even, of three consecutive ones, one is divisible by 3. One can justify this by saying that if the numbers are n, n + 1 , n + 2, we can write n = 3 k + r , where r = 0 , or 2. If r = 0, then n is divisible by 3, if r = 1, then n + 2 = 3( k + 1) is divisible by 3, and if r = 2, then n + 1 = 3( k + 1) is divisible by 3. Proofs using Fermats little theorem (killing ies with a sledgehammer!) had one general serious aw. Fermats little theorem does NOT say that a p- 1 1 (mod p ) if p is prime; it says this holds if p is prime AND p | a . However, it is in fact always true that a p a (mod p ), because if p | a , then it follows from Fermats theorem multiplying both sides by a ; if p | a , then a p a (mod p ). So the people who proved that 3 must divide the product of three consecutive numbers by using that n 3 1 (mod 3) used a correct result, though either without proof or with an incorrect proof. But when they then wrote n 1 (mod 2) to somehow conclude...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 07/13/2011 for the course MAS 3202 taught by Professor Staff during the Summer '11 term at FAU.

Page1 / 3

intsu11midtermsecondtrys - Introductory Number Theory....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online