{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

3_Equation for the Bohr Model

3_Equation for the Bohr Model - Equation for the Bohr...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Equation for the Bohr Model (Go to page 220 of you text before you read this!) On your data sheet, we will be giving you the Rydberg constant as R H =2.18 × 10 18 J. Your book uses a different convention and value for the same constant. Equation 6.7 in your book is the form of the equation for the Bohr Model that I used in class, in my lecture notes, and the form that is given on your data sheet. The Rydberg equation (at the bottom of page 221) differs from this by some simple algebra. The value of R H as given in your text is 1.097 × 10 7 m 1 ( =2.18 × 10 18 J divided by h c ; Plancks’ constant times the speed of light). Note: the value of the constant (and the UNITS) are different, but the two constants are proportional. So why ARE there two different forms for this same equation and why are putting the E form of the equation on your data sheet rather than the 1/ λ version? The equation given at the bottom of page 221 would be a useful form for spectroscopists (people who study spectroscopy or how light is emitted and absorbed by matter). The
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}