20100927+slides - Economics 1: Fall 2010 J. Bradford...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Economics 1: Fall 2010 J. Bradford DeLong, Michael Urbancic, and a cast of thousands... hAp://delong.typepad.com/econ_1_fall_2010/ We Don’t Need Another Hero... Ladies and Gentlemen, to Your i>Clickers... •  What is the most likely outcome for the U.S. budget come 2060? –  A. We will have raised taxes to pay for government health spending. –  B. We will have cut doctors wages and enslaved them by draVing them into a socialist naWonal health service. –  C. We will have abandoned our commitment to providing state ­ of ­the ­art health care to the sick and not just the wealthy. –  D. The health care fairy will have figured out a way for us all to have all the medically ­appropriate care we need for a surprisingly low private and public budgetary cost. –  E. The federal government as we know it will have collapsed, and those of us sWll alive will be starring involuntarily in a remake of “Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome” Economics 1: Fall 2010: The Government Budget in the Medium Run J. Bradford DeLong September 20, 2010, 12 ­1 Wheeler Auditorium, U.C. Berkeley $Z100,000,000,000,000 The Debt EquaWon •  (D/Y)t = dpt + (1 + r – g)(D/Y)t ­1 •  The debt ­to ­GDP raWo this year is equal to the primary deficit + the debt ­to ­GDP raWo last year Wmes the sum of one plus the real interest rate on government debt minus the growth rate of the economy •  Solve for the stable debt ­to ­GDP raWo: –  Stability: (D/Y) =  ­dpt /(r – g) •  If r > g, there had beAer be a primary surplus... •  If r < g, what is the problem? •  But will r < g? –  If people lose confidence in your government—if r goes up—then you can get into big trouble immediately Suppose That We Are Not in a “Depression Economics” SituaWon... •  •  •  •  •  Y = Y* Y = C + I + G + NX C = c0 + cyY Y* = c0 + cyY* + I + G + NX (I + G + NX + c0) = Y*/(1 ­cy) –  If G goes up—and if nothing happens to c0—then I and NX will go down –  Do we like having I and NX go down? Probably not... How Do NX and I Fall? •  NX: Government issues more bonds Bond prices fall in dollars Interest rates rise More foreigners who have sold us imports decide not to by exports but instead to take advantage of the higher interest rates and buy bonds –  NX falls –  –  –  –  •  I: Government issues more bonds Bond prices fall Interest rates rise Businesses that were planning to borrow more and invest and expand their capacity decide not to do so –  I falls –  –  –  –  •  Unless we really want to shrink I or NX... –  Expansions of G should be accompanied by steps to diminish c0 –  What are those measures? –  Generally tax increases... Nobody Likes Tax Increases... •  But we have to do them eventually –  Or else debt crises and hyperinflaWon... •  What if we postpone them? –  A good reason to postpone them: depression economics—a cyclical deficit is a good thing –  But if we are not in depression economics, postponing deficits lowers NX and lowers I •  Hence two rules –  Balance over the business cycle –  Milton Friedman’s PAYGO Are These Rules Sustainable? •  James Buchanan’s criWque: –  “cyclical deficit in downturns good, permanent structural deficit bad” is just too complicated for the poliWcal system to process –  Hence tolerate and approve of cyclical deficits to fight downturns –  And you are seong the poliWcal stage for permanent structural deficits –  That will slow growth –  And possibly lead to financial crises and hyperinflaWon Is Buchanan Right? •  The possibility seems distressingly likely •  The number of excuses to avoid tax increases is infinite... •  The number of ways since 1980 that people— usually Republicans—have found to try to permanently unbalance the government budget in the long run is truly astonishing... –  The “Laffer Curve”: cut taxes and actually raise tax revenues: •  •  •  •  Works in some “depression economics” situaWons Works with tariffs Works when the taxes are just the levers for corrupt extorWon In the North AtlanWc? Not so much... –  A Laffer coefficient of 1/10 is what you should keep in the back of your mind Ladies and Gentlemen, to Your i>Clickers... •  Why is it important for a government to run a long ­run primary surplus? –  A. Because a failure to do so will crowd out producWve investment. –  B. Because a failure to do so will slow economic growth. –  C. Because a failure to do so will cause an immediate hyperinflaWon –  D. Because if it does it must then force the rate of interest on government debt below the growth rate of the economy Never Trust the Wall Street Journal WSJ Forecasts 06: no housing bubble 07: subprime crisis will not spread 08: we aren’t in recession 09: high inflaWon is coming 10: high interest rates are coming Ladies and Gentlemen, to Your i>Clickers... •  James Buchanan argues that even cyclical deficits should be avoided, because “cyclical deficits good, structural deficits bad” is too difficult for American poliWcs to understand. But is he right? AVer all, the animals in George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” had no trouble understanding the slogan: “four legs good, two legs bad.” –  A. He is right, because American members of congress and journalists are dumber than pigs and chickens. –  B. He is wrong, because American members of congress and journalists are smarter than pigs and chickens. –  C. He is wrong, because even though American members of congress and journalists are dumber than pigs and chickens, then can be educated to believe that cyclical deficits are not really deficits, in the same way that Squealer convinced the birds of animal farm that a wing is an organ of locomoWon and hence properly classified not as an arm but as a leg. –  D. He is right because even though poliWcians know that structural deficits are destrucWve and cyclical deficits helpful, they will pretend otherwise whenever it is in their short ­term poliWcal interest to do so. Test Your Knowledge •  Since the interest rate on Treasury debt r is less than the economy’s growth rate g, our budgetary situaWon right now is fine, except that we want to run short ­term deficits in order to reduce cyclical unemployment—right? •  How do you calculate that long ­run debt ­to ­GDP raWo? •  Why is it important that a government run a primary surplus? •  Even if the naWonal debt is sustainable, why is it good to run a balanced budget—or even a surplus—over the business cycle? •  Why don’t governments run balanced budgets over the business cycle? •  What is James Buchanan’s criWque of even cyclical deficit spending? •  What is the Laffer curve? •  Should you ever trust the Wall Street Journal? ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 07/15/2011 for the course ECON 1 taught by Professor Martholney during the Fall '08 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online