Notes 2-3-09 and 2-5-09

Notes 2-3-09 and 2-5-09 - C ivil Liberties Cont. a. Freedom...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
a. Freedom of Speech b. 1st amendment of Const. c. The right depends on how you define “free speech” i. ie shouting fire in a crowded theater d. If nothing else it protects political speech i. ie saying the pres. is stupid e. Legal Categories i. Subversive Advocacy 1. Advocating the overthrow of government by force or violence, or advocating criminal syndicalism, which includes advocating, teaching, or adding in commission of crime, Sabotage, Or unlawful acts of force and violence or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of effecting political change. 2. 1969 Brandenburg v. Ohio a. KKK leader sounded like he was threatening the gov. so he was arrested b. But he was let free bc he was not specific 3. To be arrested for it you must make a statement that makes the act “imminent”. ii. Fighting Words 1. Chaplinski v. New Hampshire a. A Jehovah’s Witness starts denouncing organized religion as “racket”. He instigates a police officer. b. AKA Fighting words
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/18/2011 for the course POLS 1301 taught by Professor Rugeley during the Spring '08 term at Texas Tech.

Page1 / 4

Notes 2-3-09 and 2-5-09 - C ivil Liberties Cont. a. Freedom...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online