1100_Lecture_Critique_Wilhoit

1100_Lecture_Critique_Wilhoit - Notes on Critique - 1...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Notes on Critique - 1 Lecture on Critique In writing a critique, you will use many of the same analytical skills that you used in your rhetorical analysis essay. The main difference between your rhetorical analysis assignment and the critique is the way in which you will be expected to evaluate the logic of the article you are commenting on. In the critique, you will not only evaluate how well the strategies the author uses to convey his or her argument serve their purpose, as you did in the rhetorical analysis, but you will also evaluate the author's purpose itself, considering whether this objective, and the argument supporting it, makes sense. Whereas in the rhetorical analysis, the final basis of evaluation was the author's goal, in the critique, the basic standard of judgement is your own point of view: your informed perspective on whether this goal, and the means used to achieve it, are logically valid. The critique assignment, then, differs somewhat from your previous essays in that you will be required to present and support "your own ideas" or point of view on the issues the author discusses. At the same time, though, it builds on these earlier assignments insofar as your point of view should be an informed and logically supportable one that takes into account and is situated among the perspectives of other writers. It is important when presenting your point of view that you position it in relation to the ideas of the author you are critiquing, acknowledging and analyzing his or her claims and supporting arguments, observing their strengths and potential weakness, and explaining where and how you differ. Taking this approach will enable your own perspective to appear not as a crude, merely personal opinion held in ignorance or stubborn defiance of other views on the issue, but as a thoughtful, considered position that acknowledges the finer points that make up the debate. An important question to ask—and answer—when writing your critique, then, is whether or not you agree with, or are convinced by, the perspective or argument the author of the article you are discussing makes. An even more important question to ask and answer, though, is why you are or are not convinced. To answer this second question, you must look closely at exactly how the author makes and supports his or her points—in effect, do a rhetorical analysis of the essay—and figure out precisely what is or is not working for you. Is the author pulling at your heart-strings with highly emotional,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/24/2011 for the course ENGL 1100 taught by Professor Walsh during the Spring '11 term at Kwantlen Polytechnic University.

Page1 / 4

1100_Lecture_Critique_Wilhoit - Notes on Critique - 1...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online