Reading 1 Peter Singer Famine, Affluene, and Morality

Reading 1 Peter Singer Famine, Affluene, and Morality -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Famine, Affluence, and Morality The thesis is about to what extent people are required to assists those in need. The argument is that people should help those unfortunate than them if the act of helping doesn’t have significant moral implications. The weakness is that Signer only views one side of the argument and even admits that he doesn’t care for other peoples views. He assumes that his statements are correct not matter how absurd they may seem to others. Review Questions 1. The moral implication is that the way people in affluent countries react to a situation like that in Bengal can’t be justified. 2. His first moral principle is that we are required to prevent what is bad, and not what is good, and we are required to do this only when we can do it without sacrificing anything that is morally important. 3. The second moral principle is that the fact that there are millions of other people in the same position, in respect to the Bengali refugees does not make the situation different from a situation different from a situation in which an individual is the only one who can prevent something bad from occurring. The
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

Reading 1 Peter Singer Famine, Affluene, and Morality -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online