Ch01 - H Chapter One H INCOME TAXATION OF CORPORATIONS SOLUTION TO RESEARCH PROBLEM RESEARCH PROBLEM 1-35 5 5 5 5 Linda is correct in her

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
H Chapter One H INCOME TAXATION OF CORPORATIONS SOLUTION TO RESEARCH PROBLEM RESEARCH PROBLEM 1-35 Linda is correct in her assessment that the regular corporate form will not be a suitable vehicle for holding her investment property. This option is not viable because losses will remain within the corporation for possible future use against corporate income. Because she can qualify for the $25,000 exception to the passive activity loss rules for actively managed rental realty, she will want the losses passed through to her for use on her individual return. 5- Linda is also correct with respect to using an S corporation as a vehicle for holding her investment. Although use of an S corporation would appear ideal because losses flow through to the shareholders, the total amount of deductible losses allowed to her would be limited to the basis in her capital account ($40,000). Given the high rate of interest on her loan and the riskiness of her investment, her basis could be reduced to zero within several years. 5- Linda’s third option is interesting and, according to the Supreme Court case of Bollinger, viable. If the corporation can be formed as a regular corporation and be treated for Federal income purposes as Linda’s agent, all losses will pass through to her and may be used against her total basis in the investment of $240,000. Her basis in her investment includes the nonrecourse note because the investment in realty was acquired with a nonrecourse loan from a qualified lender [see § 465 (b)(6)]. 5- There are, however, a number of precautions for ensuring acceptability of this third option by the IRS. According to the Supreme Court in Bollinger, the corporate-agent relationship is established if (1) the fact that the corporation is acting as agent for its shareholders with respect to a particular asset is set forth in a written agreement at the time the asset is acquired, (2) the corporation functions as the agent and not the principal with respect to the asset for all purposes, and (3) the corporation is held out as the agent and not the principal in all dealings with third parties relating to the asset. 5- If Linda follows the Supreme Court guidelines, it is very likely she will obtain her objectives. What specifically can she do? The Bollinger case provides a model of specific steps to take to establish an agency relationship. Bollinger formed an agency relationship with his corporation and stipulated that the corporation was formed solely to obtain financing, that the corporation was not liable for maintenance of the property or for repayment of any promissory notes, and that Bollinger would indemnify and hold the corporation harmless from any liability it might sustain as his agent. Note: Solutions to tax return problems 1-33 and 1-34 are located after the test bank and answers.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/26/2011 for the course TAX 772 taught by Professor Ber during the Spring '11 term at Hartford.

Page1 / 36

Ch01 - H Chapter One H INCOME TAXATION OF CORPORATIONS SOLUTION TO RESEARCH PROBLEM RESEARCH PROBLEM 1-35 5 5 5 5 Linda is correct in her

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online