solutions3

# solutions3 - Stat 665(Spring 2011 Kaizar Solutions 3...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Stat 665 (Spring 2011) Kaizar Solutions 3 Exercises 40 points total 1. (a) Yes No Jamar 186 172 Kosta 90 73 (b) • Marginal OR: 186 * 73 90 * 172 = 0 . 877 • Conditional OR, 3-pointer: 1 . 157 • Conditional OR, other: 7 . 461 (c) plotvals 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 risk of made = Yes Jamar Kosta Three Other M M (d) This is an example of Simpson’s Paradox because the marginal odds ratio favors Kosta in shooting accuracy, whereas the conditional odds ratios favor Jamar in both three- point shots and other shots. This example contains the two things needed for Simpson’s Paradox to occur: 1 • The number of three-point shots is related to player (Jamar attempts many more three-point shots) • The number of three-point shots is related to the number of made shots (three-point shots are much less successful) (e) Mantel-Haenszel X-squared = 9.334, df = 1, p-value = 0.002249 Because the p-value is so small, I reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is an association between player and shots made, for at least one type of shot. (f) Of course, the choice depends on the type of player the team needs most. However, I would choose Jamar, since he is a more successful shot, regardless of the type of shot made. I.e., the conditional odds ratios both favor Jamar....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 5

solutions3 - Stat 665(Spring 2011 Kaizar Solutions 3...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online