EXAM THREE

# EXAM THREE - SUMMER SESSION A EXAM THREE PLEASE USE THE...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

SUMMER SESSION A EXAM THREE PLEASE USE THE DATASET LABELED “DATASET FOR CORRELATIONS” THE ENTIRE EXAM IS BASED ON THE PART ONE-(20POINTS) 1. Run a correlation between quality of public administration and quality of budgetary and financial management and report your results here. Correlation= .636 P-value = .000 What does the correlation results say about the relationship between quality of public administration and quality of budgetary and financial management? The nature of the relationship between quality of public administration and quality of budgetary and financial management is a strong positive relationship. The relationship is significantly significant. If there is a one unit change increase in the quality of budgetary and financial management the quality of public administration will increase as well. 44.44% of variance of quality of budgetary and financial management can be explained by the quality of government. .636^2= .404496 .404 X 100 = 40.44 Overall conclusion for the relationship between the quality of public administration and quality of budgetary and financial management is that their relationship is significantly significant. The relationship is a strong positive relationship. The quality of public administration increases with the increase in quality of budgetary and financial management, and alas 44.44% of variance of quality of budgetary and financial management can be explained by the quality of government.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2. Run a correlation between quality of democracy and military expenditure (% of gdp) and report your results here. Correlation= -.290 P-value = .000 What does the correlation results say about the relationship between quality of democracy and military expenditure (% of gdp)? The nature of the relationship between quality of democracy and military expenditure (% of gdp) is a negative weak association. The relationship is statistically significant. With a one unit change of increase within military expenditure the quality of democracy will decrease. 8.41% of variance of quality of democracy and military expenditure can be shown. -.290^2 = .0841 .0841 X 100 = 8.41% Overall conclusion for the relationship between quality of democracy and military expenditure (% of gdp) is a negative weak association. The relationship is statistically significant. With a one unit change of increase within military expenditure the quality of democracy will decrease. 8.41% of variance of quality of democracy and military expenditure can be shown. PART TWO (20POINTS)
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 6

EXAM THREE - SUMMER SESSION A EXAM THREE PLEASE USE THE...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online