hw3math109

hw3math109 - MATH 109 Assignment 3 Due: 4/18/11 #7.2 (i)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MATH 109 Assignment 3 Due: 4/18/11 #7.2 (i) Counterexample: This is the statement that if m Z + then { n Z + : m n } = Z + . When m = 2, we have 1 / { n Z + : 2 n } so the set does not equal Z + . (iii) Proof. This is the statement that if m Z + then the set { n Z + : m n } is nonempty. Since m { n Z + : m n } , we see that the statement is true for all integers m Z + . (v) Proof. This is the statement that if n Z + then the set { m Z + : m n } is nonempty. Since n { m Z + : m n } , we see that the statement is true for all integers n Z + . #7.4 (iii) Proof. This is the statement that if x R then the set { y R : xy = 0 } is nonempty. Since x 0 = 0, we see that 0 { y R : xy = 0 } , and hence the set is nonempty. (iv) Proof. This is the statement that the set { y R : x R , xy = 0 } is nonempty....
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

hw3math109 - MATH 109 Assignment 3 Due: 4/18/11 #7.2 (i)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online