Hilb10Geom082310

Hilb10Geom082310 - DECISION PROBLEMS IN EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: DECISION PROBLEMS IN EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY Harvey M. Friedman* Ohio State University August 23, 2010 ADVANCED DRAFT MAIN ISSUE: SHOULD I CONTINUE AND DEAL WITH ARBITRARY OR NEAR ARBITRARY RINGS, OR GET OTHERS TO DO THIS, OR WRITE A SEPARATE PAPER? COMMENTS PLEASE. Abstract. We show the algorithmic unsolvability of a number of decision procedures in ordinary two dimensional Euclidean geometry, involving lines and integer points. We also consider formulations involving points in subrings of . The main tool is the solution to Hilbert's Tenth Problem. The limited number of facts used from recursion theory are isolated. 0. PRELIMINARIES. 1. REALIZING COLINEARITY. 2. REALIZING BETWEENNESS. 3. REALIZING PARALLELS. 4. REALIZING EQUIDISTANCE. 0. Preliminaries. We show the algorithmic unsolvability of a number of decision procedures in ordinary two dimensional Euclidean geometry. The main tool is the solution to Hilbert's Tenth Problem. More generally, we demonstrate algorithmic reductions between various decision problems in two dimensional Euclidean geometry over subrings of the reals, with (variants of) Hilbert's 10th Problem for subrings of the ring of real numbers. We begin with a brief account of the relevant background from recursion theory. It is convenient to work within a fixed "universal" space that is rich enough to naturally support the kind of finitary objects that our algorithms operate on. Accordingly, we use the least set T that contains the integers and the 52 lower case and upper case alphabetic characters, and where every finite sequence from T (possibly empty) is an element of T. We use the basic notion of partial recursive f:T T from recursion theory. Informally, this is a partial function from T into T such that the following holds. There exists an algorithm such that at each input x T, if f(x) = y then the algorithm yields the output y; if f(x) is undefined, then the algorithm yields no output. A recursive f:T T is a partial recursive f:T T whose domain is T. A recursive subset of T is a subset of T whose characteristic function is recursive. An r.e. (recursively enumerable) subset of T is the domain of a partial recursive f:T T. Let A,B T. We say that A is reducible to B if and only if there is a recursive f:T T such that for all x T, x A f(x) B. This is written A B. We write A B if and only if B A. It is obvious that is a reflexive and transitive relation. We say that A T is complete r.e. if and only if A is r.e. and for all r.e. B T, B A. Let A,B T. We write A B if and only if there exists a recursive bijection f:A B such that for all x T, x A f(x) B. This is the strongest notion of equivalence that is normally studied in recursion theory....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/05/2011 for the course MATH 366 taught by Professor Joshua during the Fall '08 term at Ohio State.

Page1 / 28

Hilb10Geom082310 - DECISION PROBLEMS IN EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online