This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: s to those in the educational
community legitimately entitled access to them.18
The increasing use of watermarking and encryption technologies, as well as
the availability of online databases will enable licensing organizations to become
even more responsive to the needs of both the content provider and educational
communities.19 These technological improvements should alleviate the concern identified by certain educators who favor additional copyright exemptions based
upon the alleged premise that it is often difficult to identify the copyright owner of
a particular work.20 In particular, blanket licenses such as those offered by music
performing rights organizations could be utilized, thereby obviating the need of the
licensee to identify individual owners. In fact, CCC maintains that it has a 18 See e.g., Testimony of Michael Palage, InfoNetworks, Inc. (DC transcript at p. 21); Docket no. 9,
InterTrust Technologies Corp. at pp 2-7; Docket no. 49, Software and Information Industry Association
at pp. 2-3.
Testimony of Bruce Funkhouser, Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., (D.C. transcript at pp. 263-265);
Docket no. 26, Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.; Docket no. 35, American Society of Composers,
Authors and Publishers pp. 25-27.
See e.g., Docket no. 1, Indiana Commission for Higher Education at p. 2; Docket no. 12, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 6 “repertoire license system for [its] corporate users for internal duplication similar
to the music licenses made available by BMI and ASCAP.”21
There is an emerging view in the educational community that better
licensing technology and procedures will ameliorate many of their concerns
regarding the quick and affordable availability of works.22 BMI and many other
interested parties remain confident that forthcoming advances in digital technology
will remedy current problems, fac...
View Full Document
- Spring '11