MCOM3320S'10Exam_3Review[1][1] - MCOM 3320 Spring 2010...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
MCOM 3320 Spring, 2010 Exam #3 Review Familiarize yourselves with the concepts presented in class regarding each chapter in the Parkinson text that we covered since the second exam; I have included a topical list below. Also, refer back to the cases and Acts discussed in class and listed immediately below, and think about what they stand for and why they are particularly significant. Cases we discussed: Times v. Sullivan Rosenblatt v. Baer Red Kimono Case Lyon v. Adgraphics Holiday Inn case (apparent agency example) Bolger v. Young’s Drug Products Corp. Nike, Inc. v. Kasky Virginia State Board of Pharmacy case Central Hudson case Acts we discussed: Lanham Act Children’s Television Act of 1990 Chapters and topics in the Parkinson text we discussed: 9 – Defamation Libel Slander Actual Malice Private Citizen v. Public Official/Public Figure Apparent Government Authority Test Independent Public Interest Test Fair Comment Defense Immunity Retraction Statutes of Limitation Publication of Private Facts False Light Appropriation Intrusion
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/07/2011 for the course MCOM 3320 taught by Professor Parksinson during the Fall '08 term at Texas Tech.

Page1 / 3

MCOM3320S'10Exam_3Review[1][1] - MCOM 3320 Spring 2010...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online