Wk 7 crt 205 argument evaluation

Wk 7 crt 205 argument evaluation - ARGUMENT EVALUATION 1...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ARGUMENT EVALUATION 1 Argument Evaluation Jaclyn Russo CRT/205 19:00:17 Juan Salazar
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
ARGUMENT EVALUATION 2 The first argument I have chosen for this week’s assignment is how in America the automobiles are compared to the attacks on 9/11. The premise of this argument is how the writer refers the attacks from September 11, as a tragedy that makes Americans be more prone to react with rage, even more so if this tragedy was closer to where they reside. Another premise In this argument is for Americans to instead think that the odds of being killed in a car accident is greater and more people are killed from this these incidents, especially when it’s closer to home rather than New York or other major cities. I believe that in this argument the premise is dependant to the conclusion because the claims are supported with the writer’s argument. For the argument that I picked I believe it is deductively invalid, because most of the terrorist
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/05/2011 for the course CRT 205 taught by Professor N/a during the Spring '09 term at University of Phoenix.

Page1 / 3

Wk 7 crt 205 argument evaluation - ARGUMENT EVALUATION 1...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online