Even More Ethics - Wk3

Even More Ethics - Wk3 - Interesting read this week, guys....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Interesting read this week, guys. A couple of things bother me, here. What kind of store is this when there are two department managers (implying they are peers) working in the same store and one manager needs anothers to get a promotion? Peer review? That doesnt make much sense to me; that should be a competitive atmosphere more than a subordinate one. What also bothered me was the implication that Angie was guilty. Its fairly clear that something is amiss, but baseless charges are worse than being labeled a goody-goody. While were on the topic of things that dont make sense, why does Neal have a last name, but Angie doesnt? Are they husband and wife? Brother and sister? Thats awkward. Anyway, on to the real question. Was Neal justified? Not a chance. I was morally disturbed by his reaction, although I see it every day. Neals character and apparent lack of any sort of intestinal fortitude really annoyed me as I read through the situation a number of times, and certain things became clear. So I went to my good friend, the Dictionary, for respite. Here is what I found: honor- noun- \ -n r\ : a keen sense of ethical conduct : INTEGRITY <a man of honor > (nice segue) integrity- noun...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

Even More Ethics - Wk3 - Interesting read this week, guys....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online