Chapter7b notes

Chapter7b notes - Chapter 7(Contd Investment Decision Rules...

This preview shows pages 1–11. Sign up to view the full content.

Chapter 7 (Cont’d) Investment Decision Rules

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2 Spring 2010 Focusing Question As at HKT 2009/02/20
3 Spring 2010 Focusing Question Peter bought 10,000 shares of Thiz Technology and made a 74% return in one day. John bought 10,000 shares of HKRH and made a 16.8% return in one day. Who is the more successful investor and why?

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
4 Spring 2010 Outline Decision Rules Standalone Projects Mutually Exclusive Projects Projects w/ Resource Constraints NPV vs. IRR Pay Back Profitability Index Differences in Scales Timing of CF Differences in Lives Delayed Investments Multiple IRRs
5 Spring 2010 Learning Objectives 1. Compare NPV and IRR when selecting mutually exclusive projects, and explain why NPV always gives the correct decision. 2. Compute the crossover point or incremental IRR for mutually exclusive projects with differences in scales and timing of cash flows. 3. Compute Equivalent Annual Annuity (Equivalent Annual Cost EAC) for mutually exclusive projects with different lives. 4. Compute profitability index and use it to select projects under resource constraints.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
6 Spring 2010 Mutually Exclusive Projects ± When you must choose only one project among several possible projects, the choice is mutually exclusive. Problem: ± Consider the following two mutually exclusive projects with same initial investment (projects of identical scale): Girlfriend’s Business 2-computer Internet Cafe Initial Investment \$10,000 \$10,000 Cash Flow Year 1-3 \$6,000 \$5,000 Cost of Capital 12% 12%
7 Spring 2010 Projects of Identical Scale Solution: ± Girlfriend’s Business NPV = \$4,411; IRR = 36.3% ± Internet Cafe NPV = \$2,009; IRR = 23.4% ± Both the NPV rule and the IRR rule indicate the girlfriend’s business is the better alternative. -\$10,000 \$6,000 \$6,000 \$6,000 -\$10,000 \$5,000 \$5,000 \$5,000

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
8 Spring 2010 NPV Profiles of Projects w/ Identical Scale
9 Spring 2010 Projects with Differences in Scale ± What if there are 10 computers in the internet cafe? i.e., the internet café investment is 5 times larger? ± The NPV would be 5 times larger at \$2009*5 = \$10,046, but the IRR remains the same at 23.4%. ± The girlfriend’s business has an IRR of 36.3%, but its NPV is only \$4,411. ± Our decision: Use NPV rule The 10-computer internet café makes more money. Æ It has a higher NPV.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
10 Spring 2010 Return Vs Dollar Impact on Value ± The IRR is a measure of the average return , but NPV is a measure of the total dollar impact on value . ± When a project’s size is doubled, its NPV will double.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 36

Chapter7b notes - Chapter 7(Contd Investment Decision Rules...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 11. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online