Digraphs+Theory,+Algorithms+and+Applications_Part17

# Digraphs+Theory,+Algorithms+and+Applications_Part17 - 6.5...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 6.5 Pancyclicity of Digraphs 303 ( i = 0 , 1 , 2) contains a directed path of length 2, then D contains no cycle of length 5. Now we prove the sufficiency of the condition in (a). According to Theo- rem 4.8.5, there exists a semicomplete digraph T on k vertices for some k ≥ 3 such that D is obtained from T by substituting a quasi-transitive digraph H v for each vertex v ∈ V ( T ) (here H v is non-strong if it has more than one vertex). Let C be a hamiltonian cycle of D . We construct an extended semi- complete digraph D from D in the following way: for each H v ,v ∈ V ( T ), first path-contract each maximal subpath of C which is contained in H v and then delete the remaining arcs of H v . In this process C is changed to a hamiltonian cycle C of D . Suppose D is not pancyclic. Then it is easy to see that D is not pancyclic. By Theorem 6.5.6, D is triangular with a partition V ,V 1 ,V 2 . Let V i ⊂ V be obtained from V i , i = 0 , 1 , 2, by substituting back all vertices on contracted subpaths of C . Then D is triangular with partition V ,V 1 ,V 2 . Moreover each D h V i i is covered by r disjoint subpaths of C for some r . By Lemma 6.5.7, two of V ,V 1 ,V 2 , say V 1 and V 2 , induce subdigraphs with no arcs in D . If | V | = | V 1 | = | V 2 | we have the first exception in (a). Hence we may assume that | V | > | V 1 | = | V 2 | . Then D h V i contains an arc of C . From Lemma 6.5.8, we see that D h V i contains no path of length 2. This completes the proof of (a). The proof of (b) is left to the reader as Exercise 6.25. ut 6.5.3 Pancyclic and Vertex-Pancyclic Locally Semicomplete Digraphs We saw in the last subsection how the structure theorem for quasi-transitive digraphs (i.e., Theorem 4.8.5) was helpful in finding a characterization for (vertex-)pancyclic quasi-transitive digraphs. Now we show that the structure theorem for locally semicomplete digraphs (Theorem 4.11.15) is also very useful for finding a characterization of those locally semicomplete digraphs which are (vertex-)pancyclic. Our first goal (Lemma 6.5.13) is a characteri- zation of those round decomposable locally semicomplete digraphs which are (vertex-)pancyclic. Lemma 6.5.10 Let R be a strong round local tournament and let C be a shortest cycle of R and suppose C has k ≥ 3 vertices. Then for every round labelling v ,v 1 ,...,v n- 1 of R such that v ∈ V ( C ) there exist indices < a 1 < a 2 < ... < a k- 1 < n so that C = v v a 1 v a 2 ...v a k- 1 v . Proof: Let C be a shortest cycle and let L = v ,v 1 ,...,v n- 1 be a round labelling of R so that v ∈ V ( C ). If the claim is not true, then there exists a number 2 ≤ l < k- 1 so that C = v v a 1 v a 2 ...v a k- 1 v , where 0 < a 1 < ... < a l- 1 and a l < a l- 1 . Now the fact that L is a round labelling of R implies that v l- 1 → v , contradicting the fact that C is a shortest cycle. ut 304 6. Hamiltonian Refinements Recall that the girth g ( D ) of a digraph is the length of a shortest cycle in D = ( V,A ). For a vertex)....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 20

Digraphs+Theory,+Algorithms+and+Applications_Part17 - 6.5...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online