2011-20_Spe1 - EVOLUTION (11:704-486) - SPECIES PROBLEM...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
EVOLUTION (11:704-486) - SPECIES PROBLEM S MOUSE – SPRING 2011 1 T HE S PECIES P ROBLEM The Central Difficulty: We have bandied around the label “species” for this course rather freely, but we have yet to define what the term “species” actually means in evolutionary terms. We’ve been concentrating on the nitty-gritty of how the gene pool changes over space and time, that is to say with “evolution in the small” or microevolution , i.e., evolution within a species. Microevolution – A population (or a collection of populations) changes because mutations are pumped in, because genes are exchanged between adjacent populations, because genetic drift provides some sampling variation, and because natural selection sorts out what works better. Speciation – Populations diverge over evolutionary time, and eventually either go extinct or become species, but that process is too slow for us to watch in real time. It can take hundreds or thousands of generations. But, even that is too fast to see it happen in the fossil record. Inference – There is a suspicion that something important happens in the process of a single species becoming more than one species. Even Darwin could not explain how that happened, in other than divergence terms, and mostly we draw what inference we can from organisms that we catch in the process, or species that have recently gotten through it, whatever “it” is. Taxonomic Species – Species were with us long before Darwin. Linnaeus had even given them names and divided them up into genera, families, and so on. We “knew a species when we saw one”. We didn’t need to speak of evolution to talk about species. They obviously existed. Category – From a taxonomic point of view, all we needed were piles, into which we could place specimens. The piles might have internal variation in morphology, anatomy, color, or genotype, but with greater divergence among piles than variation within them. Asexual – For asexual organisms, most of our species are piles. We could divide E. coli up into several species, but the current taxonomy is based on the idea that different strains of E. coli are similar, relative to their differences from Salmonella & Shigella , two related genera. Where to draw the line around E. coli is a still matter of convenience, and based on utility. Fuzziness – No matter how we define our species, there are cases where the edges between species are a little fuzzy. There are even times when we have to draw a pretty arbitrary line around our species. The variation within them is the same order of magnitude as the differences between them, because nature “could care less” about our choice of piling rules. Biological Species:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/18/2011 for the course ECOLOGY 301 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '11 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 8

2011-20_Spe1 - EVOLUTION (11:704-486) - SPECIES PROBLEM...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online