2011-25_Intel - EVOLUTION (11:704-486) INTELLIGENT DESIGN...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
EVOLUTION (11:704-486) – INTELLIGENT DESIGN SMOUSE - SPRING 2011 1 Intelligent Design Motivation – We have heard a lot lately about the confrontation between two major threads of thought concerning “how it all got to be the way it is.” We’ve spent all semester talking about one of those ideas, specifically the idea of Evolution , what it is and what it is not. We have yet to talk seriously about Creationism , currently going under the label of Intelligent Design . Basically, evolutionary biologists, geologists, cosmologists, and so on, take the view that change is happening all the time, though often very slowly, and that while there is predictability, “there is no larger purpose” to it all. In biological terms, organisms change through time, because those that are best adapted to the current situation leave more progeny and because the characters that yield that “adaptation” are (to some degree) heritable. What it comes down to is that as the circumstances change, the organisms change as a consequence. Not everyone buys that idea. Many people, even most people, take the view that it could not be all that “pointless,” that there must be some grand “purpose to it all,” and that the process is guided by some intelligence. That basic view is as old as human civilization. There are rock paintings in Australia, dating back as far as 30,000 yrs BP, suggesting that people were thinking about their ancestors and “how it got to be this way” (as they viewed it), even then. Virtually all human civilizations have religious/spiritual components, typically involving one or more deities/spirits. Judeo-Christian thought specifies the “creation” of this world and the creatures that inhabit it. Other religions have analogues. I’m not an expert in comparative religion, by any means, but there is consistency in how humans approach this issue. In the last few years, here in the United States, the idea has been put forward that we and other organisms were “designed” by an “intelligent creator” who knew what (s)he was doing. There are those who take the view that evolution actually does occur, but that it is “intelligently guided.” There are some who take the view that evolution is obviously happening, but that “God made the rules,” and there are 1,000 different versions out there. Orthodoxies – I have heard it said that such ideas as ID represent the “crackpot views” of the Religious Right (notice the loaded language), that evolutionism (ideological labeling) is sinister and evil, and all sorts of other hostile “cross-talk.” What we have here is the difference in world views by two orthodoxies, one established and one trying to become established in its place. Any established orthodoxy will react to a challenge in this way. We could take the view that
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 8

2011-25_Intel - EVOLUTION (11:704-486) INTELLIGENT DESIGN...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online