bis_104_pq_12_ans_spring_08

bis_104_pq_12_ans_spring_08 - was observed) When...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
BIS 104 Practice Question #12 12. When PECAM-1 positive / EphrinB2 negative undifferentiated ECs were treated with 2.5 pM pure VEGF protein, approximately 50% of the ECs responded by differentiating (they began expressing EphrinB2). His treatment with VEGF did not lead to any net change in the total number of ECs. What may be concluded from these results? CONCLUSION: The differentiation of ECs following exposure to VEGF is a true inductive process mediated by the ligand. It is not achieved by VEGF mediated stimulation of clonal expansion of a previously existing EC subpopulation. (i.e., no net increase in EC cells number
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: was observed) When undifferentiated ECs were treated with higher concentrations of VEGF (25 and 250 pM) under the same conditions as above, there was no further increase in the number of EphrinB2 positive cells beyond that achieved with 2.5 pM VEGF. What is a possible explanation for this result? Low levels of VEGF were sufficient to saturate all existing VEGF receptors on responding ECs. The remaining 40 - 50% of non-responding ECs may lack functional receptors for VEGF, so no matter how much VEGF is added they will never respond....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/18/2011 for the course BIS 104 taught by Professor Scholey during the Spring '08 term at UC Davis.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online