Libya NC - Terrorism NC I negate The value is morality as...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Terrorism NC I negate, The value is morality as prescribed by the resolution Report, available at Economic sanctions offer the ability to fight terrorists, Crimm, Professor of Law at St. Johns writes in ‘04 A powerful weapon in the U.S. government's financial war on terrorism is the use of economic sanctions against terrorists, terrorist groups, and their private sponsors. The discretionary power to impose economic sanctions during war, as well as during times of peace upon the declaration of a national emergency, has long resided with the President of the United States. My thesis is that economic sanctions are key to solving terrorism. Terrorist attacks pose a direct threat to civilians, which is unacceptable, James Barth et a l Senior Fellow at the Milken Institute writes, James R. Barth et al 2006, “Economic Impacts of Global Terrorism: From Munich to Bali,” Milken Institute October 2006 Terrorism has been most succinctly defined as “the intentional use of, or threat to use violence against civilians or against civilian targets, in order to attain political aims .” 3 During the past 35 years, the world has witnessed nearly 20,000 terrorist incidents , ranging from the hostage takeover during the 1972 Munich Olympics to the 2002 and 2005 tourist bombings in Bali. . Terrorist incidents worldwide during this time period have resulted in more than 90,000 casualties or injuries (Table 1) 4 . Although the basic objectives of terrorism have remained largely unchanged over the years, technological progress has allowed terrorists to employ more sophisticated and, at times, devastating tactics. This, along with the increasingly global scope of terrorism, has raised important questions about its economic impacts in countries around the world. And, terrorism has devastating consequences, Lippman. The contemporary era has ushered in a "new terrorism." 44 Terrorist groups, in the past, generally possessed coherent ideological platforms and aspirations and selected targets which advanced and symbolized these goals. 45 They were sensitive to the need to maintain political legitimacy and avoided intentionally targeting innocents. 46 The "new terrorists ," in [*303] contrast, are driven by an apocalyptic and millenarian religiously-based worldview which posits that the world must be destroyed in order to cleanse the globe of paganism and impurity. 47 This predisposes contemporary terrorists to develop and to deploy nuclear, biological and chemical weapons (NBC) of mass destruction (WMD), 48 which are increasingly available in the global marketplace. 49
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/09/2011 for the course US 122 taught by Professor Trelawney during the Spring '10 term at Colby-Sawyer.

Page1 / 4

Libya NC - Terrorism NC I negate The value is morality as...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online