This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Theory Part 2 Why we run theory? Must be able to adjust skill sets…don’t conform 1) Checking abuse – running a prioris 2) Determine why one interp is better than another provides a metastandard to competing claim 3) Structure to appeal to judges’ intuitions 4) Strategy- winning rounds Theory is a metastandard that defends/critiques certain aspects of debate Judges are becoming more keen to theory They’re becoming more topic specific – community establishes norms like no 10 a priori cases. a) Interpretation - why we care about the round? No risk args. Are theoretically illegitimate, those which he can win the round and I cannot. You need to define terms. This part is just an outline – no justifications. Write the interpretation out b) Violation – explanation of why the opp. Does something that wrongs you. 1) need to be specific as you can 2) don’t explain why violation is bad c) Standards – measure to what degree or the aim of what is met you’re saying this is what...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/09/2011 for the course US 122 taught by Professor Trelawney during the Spring '10 term at Colby-Sawyer.
- Spring '10