Theory Part 3

Theory Part 3 - Theory Part 3 Counter-interpretation a)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Theory Part 3 Counter-interpretation a) Phrased in same way as theory, but in a different route. They’re absolutely necessary to answer theory shells 1. You can say that there is another standard that is more importan 2. Under their standard I provide better ground 3. Run them strategically to minimize impacts of theory shell 4. Do not link to their theory shell or meet their interpretation* “I meet” 5. Challenge the validity of their standards. 6. Answering the voter itself – fairness, education is not a voter 7. Answering the impact – “don’t drop the debater, drop the argument because theory is a gateway issue that frames substance”. Don’t let them clarify because it will be abusive RVIs 1. Time skew 2. Deters bad debaters from running theory shells 3. Reciprocity – theory is a 2 way street – both debaters should have the ability to win it Arguments against RVIs 1.Deters the use of theory 2. reciprocity – theory frames substance
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

Theory Part 3 - Theory Part 3 Counter-interpretation a)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online