This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 4. Artificially inflates the status quo – It deters us from reading add-ons and turns that the counterplan solves, which turns the search for the best policy option and education 5. Not reciprocal - We can’t change our advocacy – proving that their rules are unpredictable 6. Infinitely regressive – the Neg could run multiple conditional advocacies without worrying about contradiction 7. This is a voter for fairness and competitive equity 8. Dispo solves all of their offense, by allowing the Aff to have some control over what the Neg goes for in the 2NR Necessary but insufficient burden Interpretation: the affirmative must defend an...
View Full Document
- Spring '10
- coherent, best policy option, multiple conditional advocacies, Dispo, Decreases critical thinking, in-depth debate discussion