This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: deontology uniquely accounts for this distinction because it does not deal with states of affairs If running deont. Put answers to util. Make a criterion into a burden. Arguing against hyperspecific standards explain why standard doesnt make sense or just link in (gain access to impacts) If they never justify consequential ism get concessions in cross ex or point out how they dont appeal to a standard Clarify that any answers to consequentialism take out standardgfgfgfgfgffgfgfgfgfgfggd...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/09/2011 for the course US 122 taught by Professor Trelawney during the Spring '10 term at Colby-Sawyer.
- Spring '10