DRUG COURTS ARE VERY BADD

DRUG COURTS ARE VERY BADD - Meadows LD NAME TOPIC YEAR Drug...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Meadows LD NAME T OPIC YEAR Drug Courts Bad 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Meadows LD NAME T OPIC YEAR RECIDIVISM Drug courts do not solve. They have no impact on redicivists. (Morris Hoffman writes,) Drug courts don't work; They turn neutral judges into cheerleaders, substitute parents. BYLINE: Morris Hoffman SECTION: EDIT; Pg. 11A LENGTH: 361 words URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n961/a09.html Pubdate: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 Source: USA Today (US) I ndependent evaluations of drug courts have been mixed, but many show that drug courts have no, or very little, impact on re-arrest recidivism . In Denver, for example, where I sit as a trial judge, an evaluation of our drug court done by the insiders who ran it claimed enormous reductions in recidivism. But when independent evaluators from the University of Denver looked at the program, they found that it reduced recidivism from a depressing 58% down to a still depressing 53 %. Even that 5-point drop was well within the study's margin of error. But it's not just that drug courts don't work, or don't work well. They have the perverse effect of sending more drug defendants to prison, because their poor treatment results get swamped by an increase in the number of drug arrests . By virtue of a phenomenon social scientists call "net-widening," the very existence of drug courts stimulates drug arrests. Police are no longer arresting criminals, they are trolling for patients. Denver's drug arrests almost tripled in the two years after we began our drug court. At the end of those two years, we were sending almost twice the number of drug defendants to prison than we did before drug court. 2
Background image of page 2
Meadows LD NAME T OPIC YEAR 3
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Meadows LD NAME T OPIC YEAR JUDGES Drug courts turn judges into cheerleaders and because of this their role is diminished. Morris Hoffman writes, Drug courts don't work; They turn neutral judges into cheerleaders, substitute parents. BYLINE: Morris Hoffman SECTION: EDIT; Pg. 11A LENGTH: 361 words URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v08/n961/a09.html Pubdate: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 Source: USA Today (US) Drug courts also turn judges from neutral magistrates into a combination of treatment cheerleader and substitute parent. When we try to treat addiction either as a simple disease or a matter of criminal choice, and drug users as moral inpatients, the only thing we accomplish is to create a dangerous and untrained judiciary that thinks it can intrude into the lives of citizens for as long as it takes to cure them. As a state felony trial judge, I understand the scourge of drugs as well as anyone. But trying to cover up our national schizophrenia over drug policy with the veneer of ineffective, even counterproductive, drug courts does no good, except perhaps to make judges feel better when we send our treatment failures to prison.
Background image of page 4
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 12

DRUG COURTS ARE VERY BADD - Meadows LD NAME TOPIC YEAR Drug...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online