BUL4602 Fall-2011 Lecture 9 , Reading 6

BUL4602 Fall-2011 - To the Editor The Commentary by Markel et al(1 argues that the Speaker case was incorrectly handled primarily because there was

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
July 30, 2007 To the Editor: The Commentary by Markel et. al. (1) argues that the Speaker case was incorrectly handled primarily because there was insufficient federal legal authority that could have prevented the problems. We in the Florida Department of Health do not believe this is the correct explanation or that the remedy is to expand federal public health authority to improve public health response within the United States. We believe that the problems that occurred were likely due to the clinical complexity of the case and difficulties in communications between federal and state and local public health officials, rather than a lack of adequate public health authority. The authors allege breakdowns in clear lines of authority, but they provide no evidence that existing authorities were not sufficient. Clearly, the border guard incident was a breakdown in performance, not in legal authority. There has been no public discussion about whether there was disagreement between the clinicians directly involved with Mr
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/23/2011 for the course BUL 4602 taught by Professor Johnson during the Spring '11 term at W. Florida.

Page1 / 2

BUL4602 Fall-2011 - To the Editor The Commentary by Markel et al(1 argues that the Speaker case was incorrectly handled primarily because there was

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online