section2.4b

# section2.4b - REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES 2.4 MODES OF...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 2.4 MODES OF CONVERGENCE CHRISTOPHER HEIL 2.4.1 The relation between convergence in measure and pointwise convergence Although convergence in measure does not imply pointwise convergence, we do have the following weaker (but still very useful) conclusion. Theorem 1. If f n m f , then there exists a subsequence { f n k } k N such that f n k f point- wise a.e. Proof. Since f n m f , we can find n 1 < n 2 < · · · such that n n k , μ n | f - f n | > 1 k o 1 2 k . Define E k = n | f - f n k | > 1 k o and H m = S k = m E k . Then we have μ ( E k ) < 1 2 k and μ ( H m ) X k = m 1 2 k = 1 2 m - 1 . Set Z = T m =1 H m . Then μ ( Z ) μ ( H m ) 1 / 2 m - 1 for every m , so we have μ ( Z ) = 0. If x / Z , then x / H m for some m . Hence x / E k for all k m , which implies | f ( x ) - f n k ( x ) | ≤ 1 k , all k m. Thus f n k ( x ) f ( x ) for all x / Z . Since Z has measure zero, we therefore have pointwise convergence of f n k to f almost everywhere. As an important special case we have the following. Corollary 2. If f n f in L 1 ( X ), then there exists a subsequence { f n k } k N such that f n k f pointwise a.e. These notes follow and expand on the text “Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and their Applications,” 2nd ed., by G. Folland. 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2 2.4 MODES OF CONVERGENCE 2.4.2 A Cauchy criterion for convergence in measure Although convergence in measure is not associated with a particular norm, there is still a useful Cauchy criterion for convergence in measure. Definition 3. Given measurable f n on X , we say that { f n } n Z is Cauchy in measure if ε > 0 , μ {| f m - f n | ≥ ε } → 0 as m, n → ∞ . Precisely, this means that ε, η > 0 , N > 0 such that m, n > N = μ {| f m - f n | ≥ ε } < η. The usefulness of the Cauchy criterion is that it does not require us to know what the limit function is — we can test for Cauchyness without knowing whether the sequence converges. Further, the next theorem says that for convergence in measure, Cauchyness is equivalent to convergence. In order to prove the theorem, we need the following exercise. Exercise 4. Let f n be measurable functions on X . (a) Prove that E = { x X : lim n →∞ f n ( x ) exists } is measurable. (b) Show that f ( x ) = lim n →∞ f n ( x ) , if the limit exists , 0 , otherwise , is a measurable function. Theorem 5. Given measurable f n on X , the following statements are equivalent. (a) { f n } n N is Cauchy in measure. (b) There exists an f such that f n m f .
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern