section2.4b - REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 2.4 MODES OF...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 2.4 MODES OF CONVERGENCE CHRISTOPHER HEIL 2.4.1 The relation between convergence in measure and pointwise convergence Although convergence in measure does not imply pointwise convergence, we do have the following weaker (but still very useful) conclusion. Theorem 1. If f n m → f , then there exists a subsequence { f n k } k ∈ N such that f n k → f point- wise a.e. Proof. Since f n m → f , we can find n 1 < n 2 < ··· such that ∀ n ≥ n k , μ n | f- f n | > 1 k o ≤ 1 2 k . Define E k = n | f- f n k | > 1 k o and H m = ∞ S k = m E k . Then we have μ ( E k ) < 1 2 k and μ ( H m ) ≤ ∞ X k = m 1 2 k = 1 2 m- 1 . Set Z = ∞ T m =1 H m . Then μ ( Z ) ≤ μ ( H m ) ≤ 1 / 2 m- 1 for every m , so we have μ ( Z ) = 0. If x / ∈ Z , then x / ∈ H m for some m . Hence x / ∈ E k for all k ≥ m , which implies | f ( x )- f n k ( x ) | ≤ 1 k , all k ≥ m. Thus f n k ( x ) → f ( x ) for all x / ∈ Z . Since Z has measure zero, we therefore have pointwise convergence of f n k to f almost everywhere. As an important special case we have the following. Corollary 2. If f n → f in L 1 ( X ), then there exists a subsequence { f n k } k ∈ N such that f n k → f pointwise a.e. These notes follow and expand on the text “Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and their Applications,” 2nd ed., by G. Folland. 1 2 2.4 MODES OF CONVERGENCE 2.4.2 A Cauchy criterion for convergence in measure Although convergence in measure is not associated with a particular norm, there is still a useful Cauchy criterion for convergence in measure. Definition 3. Given measurable f n on X , we say that { f n } n ∈ Z is Cauchy in measure if ∀ ε > , μ {| f m- f n | ≥ ε } → as m, n → ∞ . Precisely, this means that ∀ ε, η > , ∃ N > 0 such that m, n > N = ⇒ μ {| f m- f n | ≥ ε } < η. The usefulness of the Cauchy criterion is that it does not require us to know what the limit function is — we can test for Cauchyness without knowing whether the sequence converges. Further, the next theorem says that for convergence in measure, Cauchyness is equivalent to convergence. In order to prove the theorem, we need the following exercise. Exercise 4. Let f n be measurable functions on X . (a) Prove that E = { x ∈ X : lim n →∞ f n ( x ) exists } is measurable. (b) Show that f ( x ) = lim n →∞ f n ( x ) , if the limit exists , , otherwise , is a measurable function....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/25/2011 for the course MATH 7338 taught by Professor Heil during the Fall '09 term at Georgia Tech.

Page1 / 7

section2.4b - REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 2.4 MODES OF...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online