flowchart_feedback_for_team16_back

flowchart_feedback_for_team16_back - Response to Feedback 1...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ENGR 19500 – Fall 2009 Evaluation of Flowchart for Game Rules Class Rubric for Flowcharts Team # Flowchart Being Evaluated: ____16_____ Game Rules for _____Yahtzee_____ Team Member Names: Brandon Lopez, Javier Castanieda Team # Performing Peer Review: ____16_____ Team Member Names: Tej Rajendran, Megha Tiwari Criteria Unacceptable (0) Marginal (1) Acceptable (2) Exceptional (3) 1. Accurate 2 2. Organized 1 3. Thorough/Complete 1 4. Effective
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ENGR 19500 – Fall 2009 2 5. Efficient 2 Written Feedback: Your flow cart is confusing and a little hard to follow. I think it would be best if you guys spread out your work so we are able to read through it and understand the rules of the game clearly. It would also be helpful if you had gone in depth with the rules of the game and the procedure, because we have never played the game and we were not really able to follow what was going on.
Background image of page 2
ENGR 19500 – Fall 2009 Flowchart for Game Rules Evaluation
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Response to Feedback 1. Identify 2 or more things that you need to address in order to improve your work. Write out how you can / will address these things. Comment here 2. Are their comments that you do not agree with? Write out why you do not agree. Comment here 3. Are there comments you do not understand? Write out what needs to be clarified. Comment here Feedback to Peer Reviewers: Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree 1. It is evident from that the Peer Reviewers made an honest attempt to understand out work. 2. This Peer Review was clearly written, easy to interpret. 3. This Peer Review is a fair and accurate assessment of our team’s work. 4. The Peer Review will enable us to make substantive changes to improve our work. 5. What was most helpful? Comment here 6. What was least helpful? ENGR 19500 – Fall 2009 Comment here...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 4

flowchart_feedback_for_team16_back - Response to Feedback 1...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online