adelphia case - fallout. The board didnt act in favor of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Lauren Brockmiller Dr. Barr BUS 101 1/28/11 Adelphia Case The owners in this case are mostly the Rigas family. There are a few other shareholders, but since the Rigas had most of the voting power, they would be considered a pretty powerful owner. Since the Rigas family is the owners of the company in both senses of the word, their interest is to make money for the company so they get more money. The primary responsibility of the board of directors is to oversee that decisions being made are in the best interest of all stockholders. Including employees and even the stockholders with smaller voting power, because together they have a lot of voting power. Although in this case, even if you got all stockholders against the Rigas, they would lose because they owned over half the company. I think that since most of the board was made mostly of the Rigas family, the board did act in their favor. The Audit committee over looked important aspects that caused the company’s
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: fallout. The board didnt act in favor of all stakeholders, but in favor of the most influential ones. I think that if the owners had acted appropriately, they would have covered up these mistakes better. The other owners, the smaller shareholders, acted appropriately by suing the crap out of the Rigas family. The Government got involved by running an audit and by using their SEC rights to do an investigation on Adelphia. This kept everything legal. Other than that, the government helped sue the owners that had made the mistakes. The Sarbannes-Oxley act would have helped in that the Rigas that was on the audit committee couldnt have helped the family get away with what it did. It keeps the whole conflict of interest thing to a minimum. Basically, if this would have been in place, it wouldnt have happened....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/29/2011 for the course BUS 101 taught by Professor Rollins during the Spring '08 term at Miami University.

Page1 / 2

adelphia case - fallout. The board didnt act in favor of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online