GE case - Lauren Brockmiller BUS 101 4/5/11 GE Dumping Case...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Lauren Brockmiller BUS 101 4/5/11 GE Dumping Case The stakeholders in this case are the owners and the environment. The owner’s interests are obviously to make money. The environment’s interests are to be a clean environment. These interests are in conflict in the fact that the owners want to make money. They want to do this by doing the cheapest things possible that are still legal. At the time of the dumping, it was legal. They are now losing money for something they did that was legal but since has become illegal. The environment would never wanted to be dirty in the first place, but as it has no voice, environmental activists have to act in its place. Since the community of activists wasn’t as large at the time of the dumping, there really wouldn’t be people to oppose the dumping of chemicals, because people weren’t as concerned about the environment. But now that there are activists, they are going to be very upset with the way GE was able to dump their chemicals in the past. They will be able to claim that it was “irresponsible of GE.”
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

GE case - Lauren Brockmiller BUS 101 4/5/11 GE Dumping Case...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online