H&R Block - the contract. It is clearly stated in the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
I completely agree with the court’s decision on this case. Mary Short was clearly in the wrong and violated her contract that she signed with H&R Block, however I do not agree in the partial ruling. I feel that H&R block should have received the $5,000 for the violation of Section 13 of
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: the contract. It is clearly stated in the contract about the solicitation of non-management non tax professional employees and she hired the receptionist any way. This case clearly illustrates why there is a need for contracts to cover situations like this....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/30/2011 for the course BUSINESS 101 taught by Professor Wase during the Spring '11 term at Grantham.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online