This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: After much research and confusion I was unable to find information to support this issue other than that which I have already stated above. Knight can make a claim for funds for services rendered at the time of dissolution and not for future services for which he was contracted to. After dissolution he is not eligible to collect for the remaining two years on the contract. Therefore Murdoch is only required by law to compensate Knight for the services that he has provide to the corporations up to the point when the articles of dissolution are signed by the state making the corporation officially dissolved. Murdoch would not be personally liable to pay the remaining 5 million to knight for service not rendered. (Morgan, Shedd, & Corley, 2010) Works Cited Morgan, J. F., Shedd, P. J., & Corley, R. N. (2010). Bisiness Law 3rd Edition. Redding CA.: BVT Publishing....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 08/30/2011 for the course BUSINESS 101 taught by Professor Wase during the Spring '11 term at Grantham.
- Spring '11