Chapter 11 lesson

Chapter 11 lesson - Chapter 11 Lesson Chapter 11 Lesson...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Chapter 11 Lesson Chapter 11 Lesson CHAPTER 11 - Business Torts and Crimes OBJECTIVES: After completing this lesson, the required reading, and the assignments, learners will be able to: 1. Distinguish between torts and crimes and describe the purpose of tort law. 2. List and describe several types of intentional torts. 3. Explain the elements of negligence . 4. Examine common torts in business situations. 5. Explain the concept of strict liability and examine current attempts at tort reform. Distinguishing Torts and Crimes You should be familiar with the purpose and procedure of criminal law, as well as the differences between criminal and civil law. (See Chapter 1). Tort law, which this chapter covers, is a type of civil law. (There are certainly more, such as contract law, which we will cover in later chapters.) A tort is a wrongful act which damages a person or property, thus creating legal liability on behalf of the actor who committed the tort (legally known as the "tortfeasor"). It could be a person, organization, or sometimes the government. Tort law is based on common law, not statutory law. The primary goal of a tort action is compensation of the victim. A tort is not necessarily a criminal act, although it could be. Therefore, we don't use terms like "guilty" or "convictions" in tort discussions. Instead, a defendant being sued for negligence or an intentional tort may be found "liable" or "not liable" for the plaintiff's damages. As you learned in Chapter 1, certainly one action may result in both a tort action and a criminal charge. O.J. Simpson, for instance, was charged with the crime of first degree murder. The families of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman also filed a civil wrongful death action against him seeking damages for the loss of their loved ones. As your book states on, tort law "involves determining what one's obligations ought to be toward one or more specific persons." As society's interests and priorities change, tort law usually changes as well. As a result, over time, new torts will be recognized while others become outdated and are no longer appropriate. Consider, for instance, the tort of "seduction," which allowed parents to sue men who seduced their unmarried daughters. Society may have once believed that young men should have a legal obligation to the parents of young, unwed women to avoid seducing them, but most of us would probably agree that such a view is now obsolete, for a variety of reasons (even though we may not condone such behavior). Another tort which has become outdated is "alienation of affection." Several years ago, 60 Minutes ran a piece about a lawsuit filed by the ex-wife of a man who had had an affair that ended their marriage. In addition to suing her husband for divorce, the jilted spouse also sued her husband's paramour, alleging that she had "alienated" her husband's affections away from her. She won $1 million from the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 6

Chapter 11 lesson - Chapter 11 Lesson Chapter 11 Lesson...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online