F_Word__Word - Court Backs Charge Against Canyon Man For...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Court Backs Charge Against Canyon Man For Using "F-word" Judges split; majority opinion says outburst not protected speech By Bob Fick - The Associated Press The Idaho Statesman • Idahostatesman.com September 5, 2001 A divided Idaho Court of Appeals on Tuesday upheld the misdemeanor conviction of a Canyon County man for disturbing the peace by using an obscene four letter word to express his exasperation after getting no help from a sheriffs deputy. The court split over whether the statement was protected speech under the First Amendment. "Such a personally provocative epithet, delivered in the manner and setting here, cannot be reasonably interpreted as the communication of information or opinion safeguarded by the constitution," Judge Darrel Perry wrote in the majority opinion. But in a rare dissent among the usually unanimous three-judge panel, judge Karen Lansing said that while the use of the common obscenity is insulting, it was not enough to provoke someone to violence or to significantly disrupt the activity or routine of others as required for a disturbing the-peace conviction. Lansing also warned that legitimizing arrest if "an individual uses the `f--word' in an
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/02/2011 for the course GEN BUS 202 taught by Professor Parks during the Fall '11 term at Boise State.

Page1 / 2

F_Word__Word - Court Backs Charge Against Canyon Man For...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online