This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Economics 140A Regression Model Estimators As discussed last time, we begin with the population regression Y t = & + & 1 X t + U t : How then should we infer (estimate) the value of the coe cients? We could plot the observations on graph paper and draw a line that we feel most closely &ts the data. Unfortunately, di/erent individuals may draw di/erent lines and, even for one individual the same line may not be drawn for two identical sets of observations. We wish to produce a method of inferring the value of the coe cients that is: 1) reproducible, and 2) easily communicated. To be easily communicated we must be able to both express what is meant by a close &tand to express any specialized information about the accuracy of speci&c observations. We then recognize that the error is likely always present and we must deter mine how to estimate the coe cients in light of its presence. Let B and B 1 be estimators of & and & 1 , respectively. For any value of the regressor, the predicted (&tted) value of the dependent variable given by the regression model is Y P t = B + B 1 X t : Because the error is not zero, there are two reasons why Y P t will not equal Y t . First, if U t is not zero, then in general B 6 = & and B 1 6 = & 1 . Second, even if B = & and B 1 = & 1 our prediction Y P t di/ers from Y t by U t . Thus Y t & Y P t = ( & & B ) + ( & 1 & B 1 ) X t + U t U P t ; where U P t is the predicted value of the unobserved error (often termed the resid ual). (In providing a close &t of the line to the data, note that there are many ways to measure distance from a &tted line. Any point on the &tted line corresponds to &...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 09/04/2011 for the course ECON 140a taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.
 Fall '08
 Staff
 Economics

Click to edit the document details