EC_part4 - 4.1.2 Location of housing

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
4.1.2 Location of housing Differences in endowments of household characteristics contribute roughly half the gap in PPP ln  income.  Most important here is education as explained in the above (4.1.1). Location of residence  contributes the other half of the PPP income gap. Here location’s contribution is defined as the  sum contribution to the gap of differences between urban and rural areas in the constant terms,  coefficients on provincial dummy variables, and coefficients on household and individual  characteristics. Spatial price deflation makes a difference here, reducing location’s contribution by  more than 10 percentage points. Over time the contribution of location declines somewhat, which is  consistent with increased mobility and market integration. Why, after controlling for observed characteristics, does location of residence remain so important  in explaining income differences? The hukou or household registration system and related policies  that continue to hinder rural-to-urban movement are obvious culprits. Yet the persistence of  urban-rural   gaps   in   other   countries   suggests   that   even   without   such   artificial   restrictions,  migration is unlikely to eliminate the urban-rural income gap or to equalize the returns to  education and other individual characteristics.  China’s urban-rural income gap has shown little sign of declining despite substantial easing of the  restrictions   on   migration   and   the   growing   number   of   migrants.   A   variety   of   factors   could  contribute to the persistence of spatial differences. One factor is non labor income, which accounts  for nearly half the income gap. Income inequality number is maybe not so accurate because of such  a huge number of migrations from rural to urban areas, but the migration is not likely to reduce  gaps in some forms of non-labor income such as housing-related income and pensions. Also,  migration may not be able to eliminate the gap because variables other than income may affect  decisions to move. Other relevant factors include access to community networks and support  systems,   farm   labor   requirements,   job   discrimination,   incomplete   information   about   living  conditions and employment opportunities, higher costs of living (especially housing) in cities, and  access to schooling and other public services. 4.2 Policies to combat income inequality In terms of the policy changes, the transition from 1978 until current can be roughly divided into  three periods: the development in rural areas (from 1979 to 1983), the development in urban areas  (from post 1984 to 1992), and the establishment of a socialist market economy (from 1992 until 
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/03/2011 for the course ECONOMICS ec2222 taught by Professor Chan during the Spring '11 term at National University of Singapore.

Page1 / 6

EC_part4 - 4.1.2 Location of housing

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online