Answer_Key_Ch_14

Answer_Key_Ch_14 - Answer Key 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Answer Key 1. B 2. D 3. D 4. D 5. C 6. C 7. B 8. A 9. B 10. C 11. B 12. D 13. A 14. C 15. C © 2004 Rockwell Publishing Company 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Answer Key with Explanations Question #1 Answer: B Explanation: A racially restrictive covenant is automatically considered unenforceable, so no action is necessary to remove such a covenant from a deed. However, in order to totally remove the covenant and begin with a new deed, a legal action would have to be pursued in court. Question #2 Answer: D Explanation: The seller has violated the Fair Housing Act. She also owes her broker the commission, since he did locate a suitable buyer. Question #3 Answer: D Explanation: The Fair Employment and Housing Act is also known as the Rumford Act. It prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, lease, or financing of housing. Question #4 Answer: D Explanation: Requiring minorities to pay higher prices than others is unlawful discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. The broker may be liable for money damages.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/06/2011 for the course FIN 365 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '11 term at S.F. State.

Page1 / 3

Answer_Key_Ch_14 - Answer Key 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online