{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

peezixnew - Data x 0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08 VH 0.496 1.103...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Data: x 0 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 ΔV H 0 .496 1.103 1.728 2.566 3.122 3.634 4.152 4.569 x 0 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 .12 .13 ΔV V 0 .014 .026 .038 . .036 .035 .026 .034 .014 .008 .016 .020 .006
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
022 Conclusion: As we increased the horizontal distance between our two points, we can see that the difference in voltage increases as well. From the graph, it would appear that there is a positive linear relationship between the horizontal distance apart and difference in voltage, as the correlation coefficient for the linear fit is .9973, a high value. So the equation we end up with is difference in voltage=59.50*Horizontal Distance Apart-.005556. From the second graph, it appears that all the points are scattered and random. There does not appear to be a relationship between the vertical distance apart and the difference in voltage. This
Background image of page 2
Background image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 3

peezixnew - Data x 0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08 VH 0.496 1.103...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online