Pediatricians_under_attack_for_allowing_teen.DOC

Pediatricians_under_attack_for_allowing_teen.DOC - Page 1...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Page 1 FOCUS - 1 of 1 DOCUMENT The Washington Times January 2, 1998, Friday, Final Edition Pediatricians under attack for allowing teen decisions; Policy including youngsters called 'misguided' BYLINE: Joyce Howard Price; THE WASHINGTON TIMES SECTION: Part A; NATION; Pg. A4 For years, the American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended that children deemed to have decision-making capacity be given a greater voice in tough, even life-or-death, health treatment decisions affecting them. But many oppose a 1995 policy statement by the AAP Committee on Bioethics, which says a child's position should be accepted in cases where the young patient is judged to have decision-making author- ity and there is parental-child disagreement about the appropriate course of action. One of the critics, Dr. Lainie Friedman Ross, a pediatrician and bioethicist in Chicago, described the academy's position as "misguided" in an article in the November-December issue of the Hastings Cen- ter Report, a bioethics journal. "My main concern with the AAP recommendations" is AAP's stand that a child's decision on treatment or lack thereof "should be binding" in cases where "parents and children disagree on health care de-...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online