Section 3 - Section 3: Student Rights While free expression...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Section 3: Student Rights While free expression and inquiry are important in school, they should be relevant to learning and school activities. Students have no right to use obscene, inflammatory or defamatory language. Free speech rights are protected by the constitution as long as they do not cause a material disruption to the process of education. The courts give school officials authority to ban student conduct that threatens the effective operation of the school. School administrators must protect the rights of students and the whole student body. This is often a contradictory and polarized duty. Symbolic Jewelry, Buttons, Armbands, Etc.: Schools may ban the use of such if wearing them causes a disruption of learning, and if the ban is not arbitrarily applied. For example, if a school wants to ban insignia, it must ban ALL insignia. Dress and Grooming: The courts have consistently allowed schools to regulate appearance if it promotes and protects student health, safety and discipline. Gang clothing and colors may be banned. Gestures: Obscene or disrespectful gestures may be banned if they create a disruption. Gestures related to gang activity may also be banned. Any physical gesture that offends on the basis of race, sex, religion, color or national origin may be banned. Any school mascot that offends a segment of the school population must be changed. Any school symbol that target or ridicule a group on the basis of race, sex, religion, color or national origin should be banned. Cults: Regulations of cult expression must be very specific and alert students to prohibited symbols and dress options. Satanic or other cult rituals may be banned at school. Verbal and Written Communication: Schools have a duty to teach socially acceptable behavior and may ban lewd, indecent and offensive speech. Any effort to censor speech must be reasonable in the context of the forum in which the speech is expressed. Just as limits are placed on professional journalists, student writers bear the same responsibilities regarding plagiarism, false or inflammatory articles, obscene writing, libel, fraud, and invasion of privacy. An important difference is that school publications are not considered public forums and schools may use editorial control to censor student articles. The courts have held that student publications are intended as a supervised journalistic learning experience, and that school officials may restrict student speech in such publications. The courts support the concept that speech which is curriculum related (in class, a student publication or play) may be regulated. Even when student writing appears in non-school sponsored publications, such as underground
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/09/2011 for the course MFC 484 taught by Professor Posse during the Fall '11 term at SUNY Buffalo.

Page1 / 5

Section 3 - Section 3: Student Rights While free expression...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online