Investment Banking Lecture 5

Investment Banking Lecture 5 - FPN1: INVESTMENTBANKING...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–13. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
FPN 1: INVESTMENT BANKING Lecture 5 – April 27 th 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Chapter 2 Precedent Transactions Analysis a.k.a. “Transaction Comps” 2
Background image of page 2
Review Session Wednesdays Otterson Hall 1S113 (Rady) 12.30pm to 2.30pm Will review previous lectures 3
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Apple Inc. COMPARABLE TRANSACTIONS Hewlett-Packard ’s acquisition of 3Com Corp (2009) Cisco ’s acquisition of Starvent (2009) Emerson Electric Co. ’s acquisition of Avocent (2009) Oracle ’s acquisition of Sun Microsystems (2009) 4
Background image of page 4
Step III: Spread Financial Statistics and Ratios o Equity Value o Enterprise Value Key Transaction Multiples o Equity Value Multiples o Enterprise Value Multiples Premiums Paid Synergies 5
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Step IV: Benchmarking Re-examine the business and financial profile of the target and its comparable transactions Benchmark key statistics and ratios for each of the acquired companies (given in “output” sheet) Best comparable transactions are identified, generally top 4 Eliminate obvious outliers 6
Background image of page 6
Step V: Valuation Figure out industry specific multiple Use means and medians of multiples from universe to establish prelim valuation range for target Use highs and lows as reference points Narrow down to as low as 2 or 3 of closest transactions by sector and size Evaluate final valuation range Chosen multiple range is multiplied to target’s LTM financial statistics Derive valuation range for target 7
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Apple’s Valuation All deals had Enterprise Value over $1 B Use judgment to eliminate outliers Use 75 th percentile instead of median due to Apple’s performance Use multiples to determine Enterprise Value Industry wide multiple used is EV to LTM EBITDA or EV to Forward EBITDA Determine purchase price using premiums paid data 8
Background image of page 8
Excel 9
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Apple’s Valuation 10
Background image of page 10
Precedent Transactions : Pros Market-Based Analysis is based on actual acquisition multiples and premiums paid for similar companies Current Recent transactions tend to reflect prevailing M&A, capital markets, and general economic conditions Relativity Multiples approach provides straight forward reference points across sectors and time periods Simplicity Key multiples for a few selected transactions can anchor valuation Objectivity Precedent-based and, therefore, avoids making assumptions about a company’s future performance 11
Background image of page 11

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Precedent Transactions : Cons Market-Based Multiples may be skewed depending on capital markets and/or
Background image of page 12
Image of page 13
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/13/2011 for the course MGT 181 taught by Professor Jordan during the Spring '08 term at UCSD.

Page1 / 29

Investment Banking Lecture 5 - FPN1: INVESTMENTBANKING...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 13. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online