PE-06-Seepage-Flownets

PE-06-Seepage-Flownets - Solved Problems in: Seepage and...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
140 Solved Problems in: Seepage and Flow-nets *01: Correct flawed flow-nets. *02: Flow-net beneath a dam with a partial cutoff wall. *03: Velocity of the flow at any point under a dam. *04: Flow-net through an earth levee. *05: Finding the total, static and dynamic heads in a dam. *06: Hydraulic gradient profile within an earth levee. *07: Flow into a cofferdam and pump size. *08: Drainage of deep excavations. *09: Dewatering a construction site. *10: Dewatering in layered strata. **11: Flow through the clay core of an earth dam.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
141 These color contours permit the visualization of the flow and the 14 dynamic head drops.
Background image of page 2
142 *Flownets-01: Correcting flawed flow-nets. (Revision: Aug-08) Do you recognize something wrong with each of the following flow-nets? a) b) filter c) Well Solution: a) Incorrectly drawn mesh, because two equipotential lines intersect each other (equipotential lines and flowlines must intersect orthogonally to each other). b) Incorrectly drawn mesh, because two flow-lines intersect each other (same as above). c) The well should be at the center of the net (a sink or a source point). Equipotential Lines Flow Lines
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
143 *Flow-nets-02: A flow-net beneath a dam with a partial cutoff wall. (Revision: Aug-08) The completed flow net for the dam shown below includes a steel sheet-pile cutoff wall located at the head-water side of the dam in order to reduce the seepage loss. The dam is half a kilometer in width (shore to shore) and the permeability of the silty sand stratum is 3.5 x 10 -4 cm/s. Find, (a) the total seepage loss under the dam in liters per year, and (b) would the dam be more stable if the cutoff wall was placed under its tail-water side? 15 m h = 6.0 m 2.0 m 10.0 m 17.0 m Solution: (a) Notice that h = 6.0 m, the number of flow channels N f = 3 and the equipotentials N eq = 10. Using Forcheimer’s equation, 4 6 2 3 3.5 10 (6.0 ) 6.3 10 /sec/ sec 100 10 f eq N cm m q k h m m per mof dam width N cm - - ± ± ± = Δ = × = × ² ³ ² ³ ² ³ ´ µ ´ µ ´ µ Since the dam is 500 meters wide (shore-to-shore) the total flow Q under the dam is, 3 6 3 6 3 10 sec 500 6.3 10 / 100 sec 31.5 10 1 liters Q Lq m m m year millionliters year - ± · = = × × = ² ³² ³ ¸ ¹ ´ µ ´ µ b) No. Placing the cutoff wall at the toe would allow higher uplift hydrostatic pressures to develop beneath the dam, thereby decreasing the dam’s stability against sliding toward the right (down-stream). ψ 1 ψ 2 ψ 3 IMPERVIOUS STRATUM (CLAY OR ROCK)
Background image of page 4
*Flow-nets-03: The velocity of the flow at any point under a dam. (Revision: 12 Oct.-08) Using the flow net shown below, (1) determine the seepage underneath the 1,000 foot wide concrete dam, and (2) the velocity at point “ a ” in feet/hour, where the height of the net’s square is 19 feet. The soil has a G S = 2.67, D 10 = 0.01 mm. Overestimate the flow by using Hazen’s coefficient C = 15 to determine the permeability k . a
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 6
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/11/2011 for the course CEG 4011 taught by Professor Staff during the Summer '10 term at FIU.

Page1 / 22

PE-06-Seepage-Flownets - Solved Problems in: Seepage and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 6. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online