Gaulin_McBurney - From Psychology: An Evolutionary...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
From Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach, Gaulin & McBurney, Prentence Hall, 2001. EXERPTS FROM CH.2 – book is on reserve at the library -This version was produced from a scan of the book, so some errors might be present; if you run into a confusing sentence, assume there is a small error in the transcription and read through it- Evolutionary Psychology, Natural Selection, and Sexual Selection Darwin's Argument 1. Natural populations (of giraffes, daisies, or people) could grow exponentially. Consider an asexual organism that reproduces once per day. If we begin with one of these organisms, we will have two tomorrow, four the next day, eight the next, and so on. After a month we will have 2 29 (about 540 million), and after two and a half months we will have more of these creatures than there are atoms in the universe! This conclusion is not limited to organisms that reproduce rapidly. To illustrate this point, Darwin selected the most leisurely reproducer he could think of- elephants. He assumed that a female elephant would begin reproducing by the time she was 30 years old and that she would then produce one offspring every 10 years, up to a total of six offspring, when she would die of old age. Given these assumptions, he calculated that after a mere 500 years such a female would have 15 million living descendants. Darwin ran out of computational power at that point- but modern computers can show that after a few thousand years she would have so many descendants—each of whom would be in the process of producing yet more descendants—that the earth would be a ball of elephants expanding outward at the speed of light! This is exponential growth. 2. Despite this potential for exponential growth, natural populations normally are rel atively stable. As you have no doubt noticed, this sector of the universe is not a ball of elephants expanding outward at the speed of light. There are no mistakes in the calculations, so what is wrong? It must be that some elephants do not produce six offspring over their lifetimes. The calculations tell us what would happen if the^ did. Since the conclusion is false, the assumptions are wrong, which leads to the third logical statement. 3. Many individuals do not leave as many offspring as they might. This failure is often due to limited resources. What would a ball of elephants expanding outward at the speed of light eat? What would they breathe? The resources needed to make more elephants are finite. Every time elephant A reproduces, her offspring use food, water, and other resources that would have otherwise been available for the offspring of elephant B. When a population colonizes a new, unexploited area, it maw grow exponentially for a while, but its very success means that it will soon grow to the point where, again, resources are inadequate to support the reproduction of all. 4.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 9

Gaulin_McBurney - From Psychology: An Evolutionary...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online