Unformatted text preview: application and argued that Dinesh’s “arrival” was in 1999, in which he did not apply for asylum. Further in this article, Mareth explains how the government does not define “arrival.” He later presents the Rosenberg v. Fleuti case. Overall, Mareth does a good job in explaining the flaws of the asylum system. This article is reliable, because the author explains the imperfection of the immigration law effectively. He explains it well by providing sources from facts such as the Rosenberg v. Fleuti case. The goal of this source is to tell the audience how bad the immigration system is. I will use this article to how flawed the asylum thing works. Also, I will use the facts the author provided in his article to show my readers how I back up my argument....
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- English, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Dinesh, Dinesh. Dinesh