1979 vickers 1979 df the conatural of evidence eg is

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: and McClelland, 2001; od, Howposterior probabilities. In this case, for a given weight er. 1979). Vickers, 1979). df the co“natural of evidence (e.g., is analogous to in Banburismus): This problem the stopping point one-dimensional ponses and Turing’s Weight of Evidence ted quanlar responses from a pair of sensory neurons when h a pairtrue, barriers (Link, 1992; Ratcliff Brownian motion to or h is of as indicated. For of tradePr(h1|mmotion. The lower curve would ) obabilities es of a direction-selective neuron that prefers upward The weight of evidence articular and Rouder, 1998). means of the normal B distribu(3) log ron” that prefers downward motion. Here wePr(h the simplifying assumption that the make |m) surprisal” r can be equal variances ( represent the drift rates, i (where the subscript i tions ). Note that other0 forms of the distribution, including f and and bans but old and Shadlen, 2001). The panelthe particular Turing’s weight of evidenceThe psychometon the f reward reflects B is a right shows motion strength).the barrier height where constant that represents of their difference; note the linear relationship. m of base ric function describing the probability of correctly reachexclusive hypotheses in favor of h1. For two mutually accumulate/integrate over Decision Model tion-time Figure 2. ing eitherh the is“up” r(h difference between equivalently, given) antineuron is: or “down” barrier on a Pr(h trial The weight (Pr(h favor of evidence in |m) over h the accumulated |m) or, responses of a neuron that prefers h and an 1depicted P computed under thetcondition) thatyh( is)true. The thin, wavy line depicts a simulated 1 0 0 ntlities has that prefers weight of7).evidence atare motion ( d (7) total h (see Equation The curves time1t k ihich the trajectory that represents how the weight of evidence might grow on a single trial as a function of time. The dashed line depicts the expectation 0 Pr(h1)), and assuming the weight of evidence is exn motion (mean value) of this trajectory at each time point. Note that changing the constant of proportionality used to rel...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/15/2011 for the course COGS 1 taught by Professor Lewis during the Spring '08 term at UCSD.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online