crane_slides2

In other words the likelihood of getting a match as

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: f h1 match (or, the problem ed text. In other words, the likelihood of getting a match As Turing was aware, this formulation had two distinct instruct ethe logarithm of the independently by Wald shortly after ver h0 astions was developed ratio of these likelihoods: an (m )Evidence 1favoring h1 Pr(mahdefinite stoppingthan the advantages. First, it had | 1), was greater time that Pr(on m) h1| one given h , denoted / evidence favoring h0 sthe war (Wald, 1947). log ch likelihood of getting a match given hwhen to stop working Pr(Second instructed the codebreaking team , denoted Pr(m|h ). h0|m) 0 0 d As Turing was aware, thisPr(m|h1) formulation had two distinct he Accordingly, Turing defined the weight of evidence proon one of evidence 1) Weight pair of ciphers and turn their attention (to another. log follows n advantages. First, it had aPr(m|h0) stopping time that definite Second, it predicted the accuracy of the decision,hwhere be h0|m as Pr( rela 0). h vided by a match (or, similarly, athe weight ofto stop working instructed the codebreaking non-match) in favor ofcan team when evidence 1 ofollows. By Bayes’ theorem, probabilities a over h0 of the logarithm of the ratio of attention to another. Bayes probabilities, and probabilities: ea logarithmasrule:to several this quantity isthese likelihoods: on one pair Pr(h|m) =otherturn their measured of ciphers Pr(m|h)Pr(h)/Pr(m) s1 be related h pothesis after Pr( log ). Second, it predicted of accuracy of the decision, as ) and Pr(h 0s: units that depend on the basethethe logarithm (Good, Pr(h0 Pr( Pr(m of Pr( 1|m) Pr(hof o- In Banburismus, logarithms 1) base weight|hused follows.hBy Bayes’ theorem, the 10 were 1) evidence describe the p can 979). Weight oflog evidence lweight of evidence, (1) og (2) log Pr(m| actuPr(h0|m) be related to (the Banburismus processh other h1 were called “bans” severalPr(h0) probabilities:0) nd where evidence is sa (1) s: computed weights of evidence in units of 1/10th of lly probab prior probabili wherer(Pr(m|m) and Pr(h11|)m) are called the posterior P h1| h0of probabilities, this quantity is measured ) Pr(h As log logarithm ban—a adeciban—that the codebreakers considered log weight of evidence, hy(2) pothesi assumption m probabilities) and describe) the probability of each Pr(h0smalleston the baseevidence that is (Good, |m Pr(h0of of the logarithm be in units that depend the evidence has been sampled, and Pr(h a ed “abou...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online