This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court rule that there is no absolute right to counsel at probation or parole revocation proceedings. Whether the offender is provided with counsel is to be determined on a case- by-case basis and, absent a compelling reason for providing counsel, counsel is unnecessary? A) Morrissey v. Brewer (the Supreme Court established that parole revocation and, by implication, probation revocation is to be a two stage process. In the first stage, there must be an informal, preliminary inquiry to establish probable cause that a violation has occurred. In the second stage (assuming that probable cause is established in the first stage), there must be a formal court hearing to determine if the violation warrants revocation) B) Gagnon v. Scarpelli C) Griffin v. Wisconsin D) Mempa v. Rhay In which of the following decisions did the Supreme Court hold that a search warrant based on probable cause is unnecessary for a probation officer to search a probationer's home; that reasonable grounds is a sufficient basis for the search?probation officer to search a probationer's home; that reasonable grounds is a sufficient basis for the search?...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/11/2011 for the course TERM 1 taught by Professor Smith during the Spring '11 term at FIT.
- Spring '11