closing statement

closing statement - 3. And we proposed better plans to...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Wei Na Xie Karl Popper Debat Closing speech It is time for us to end our part in this discussion, which has the potential to continue ad infinitum. We understand our opponents’ consideration, however, we still do not agree it is the right time for US government to actively promot the use of biofuel. As we made the opening statement, 1. 2. 3. 4. There are/is (some) definitions I need restate here: 1. 2. 3. The opponets focused on: 1. 2. 3. However, 1. Carbon advantage of biofuels may be overstated 2. The opponets’ plan might not work (Tech, cost, government regulation)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 3. And we proposed better plans to sovle the energy crisis Bruce Dale, the associate director of the Office of Biobased Technologies at Michigan State University and a co-author of the letter, he Spoke to Ethanol Producer Magazine, said We do not have the ability right now, technically, to measure the indirect land use change effects. Its not the right time for US government to actively promote the use of biofuels!...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

closing statement - 3. And we proposed better plans to...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online